SAP Fires Back at Waste ManagementSAP said in a court filing that Waste Management is to blame for problems with its enterprise resource planning...
Chris Kanaracus, IDG News Service
SAP attorneys have filed a counterclaim to the lawsuit Waste Management filed in March over dissatisfaction with an enterprise resource planning implementation, asserting the vendor's innocence and charging in turn that the trash-disposal company violated the deal's contract.
Waste Management's initial complaint states that in 2005, the company was seeking a new revenue management system, and SAP said its Waste and Recycling product was ideal for Waste Management's needs. SAP also allegedly said the software could be fully implemented throughout the company within 18 months.
In addition, senior SAP executives allegedly participated in "rigged and manipulated" product demonstrations prior to the deal that employed "fake software environments, even though these demonstrations were represented to be the actual software."
After a deal was signed in October 2005, SAP's implementation team soon discovered gaps "between the software's functionality and Waste Management's business requirements," and SAP's German product development team knew these existed before the deal closed, according to Waste Management.
SAP eventually determined that if Waste Management wanted an enterprise-wide deployment, it would have to develop a new application with an updated version of SAP's platform, pushing the project's estimated completion date from December 2007 "to an end-date sometime in 2010 without any assurance of success," according to Waste Management's complaint.
But SAP's amended counterclaim, filed in July in a Harris County, Texas, court, said those claims are invalid because Waste Management "understood and expressly agreed that SAP America not warrant that the applications in the Software are designed to meet all of [Waste Management's] business requirements."
In addition, Waste Management allegedly violated its contractual agreement with SAP in a number of ways, including by "failing to timely and accurately define its business requirements"; not providing "sufficient, knowledgeable, decision-empowered users and managers" to work on the project; and failing to successfully migrate data from the legacy system.
SAP alleges that it is owed millions in maintenance and services fees, and is seeking unspecified compensatory damages as well as the return of its software.
An SAP spokesman said Thursday that the company does not comment on ongoing litigation, but the company is "confident in the actions of the court." A Waste Management spokeswoman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.